RSS

Category Archives: Bill of Rights

In Violation of Visitation

Visiting privileges?  What visiting privileges?  You know I got none in the recent divorce from politics.

The American political front has to become a different place where our country is considered most important beyond any entity created within.  Where each, and every citizen is valued beyond corporations, and other groups. Peaceful.

At best, each citizen, by, Supreme Court dictum enjoys equal status to corporations.  There sure are a lot of non-profits out there amongst our individual citizens.

When we are past the time of government becoming separate, and apart to serve itself before each of its’ individual citizens, I might petition for visiting rights.  That will be the time when, government is not a part time, additional unpaid job for individual citizens to participate.

In order to petition for visiting rights, even part time, government must change direction from rendering its’ citizens more helpless with every bill introduced, and bound in to law.  It must instead, be ever constantly aware of its’ subservient rights to each citizen under the Constitution.  That is much to ask after it has veered so far off that constitutional path but, it is their obligation.  It is also our obligation to receive our individual rights under the Constitution.

In the mean time while government should be bracing for a final time before, a constitutional break-out by its’ individual citizens, I will maintain a healthy distance.

I am spelling out my conditions for future visitation but, not visiting.

I admit to getting close to a violation of visitation but, I’m not in violation, am I?

Related Articles

 

Tags: , , , ,

OCCUPY GOES RAD, MAD & THAT’S BAD

THERE ARE LAWS FOR THE COMMON GOOD.  SOMETIMES THOSE LAWS MAY NOT SEEM THAT WAY.  SOMETIMES, THEY’RE REALLY NOT FOR THE COMMON GOOD BUT, RATHER THE BENEFIT OF SOMEONE WITH DEEP POCKET CHANGE TO HELP FINANCE THE CAMPAIGN OF THEIR CONgressional REPRESENTATIVE.

THE OCCUPY WALL STREET SUBSIDIARY GROUP IN OAKLAND, CA. FOUND A VACANT BUILDING, AND DECIDED THEY WOULD TURN IT IN TO A FUNCTIONING COMMUNITY CENTER.  IT IS A NICE THOUGHT BUT, THERE ARE LAWS.

THE LAWS ARE THERE TO PROVIDE FOR ORDERLY OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING.  EVEN IN A ‘FREE’ SOCIETY THERE ARE LAWS TO KEEP ORDER.  

IF IT IS PRIVATELY OWNED, THEY HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT TO INVADE PRIVATE PROPERTY.  IF IT IS GOVERNMENT OWNED, WE LITERALLY ALL HAVE A STAKE IN THE PROPERTY.  THERE ARE STILL LAWS PROVIDING FOR THE OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING.

IN THIS CONTEXT, THERE SHOULD BE LAWS TO PROVIDE FOR NON-PROFIT USE OF ANY VACATED ‘GOVERNMENT OWNED’  PROPERTY.  THESE LAWS GIVE THE GOVERNMENT A 90 DAY TIME FRAME TO OCCUPY OR, COMMIT THE BUILDING TO THE FIRST PUBLIC GROUP CLAIMING THE PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE COMMON GOOD, AND MUST NOT RE-CLAIM THE BUILDING FOR OCCUPANCY UNTIL THE OCCUPYING ‘COMMON GOOD’ OCCUPIER HAS VOLUNTARILY WITHDRAWN USE OR, 12 YEARS, WHICHEVER ARRIVES FIRST.

THE GOVERNMENT WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MEETING BUILDING CODES UPON INITIAL OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING BY, THE NON-PROFIT GROUP.  THE OCCUPIER WOULD BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN THE STRUCTURE TO ALL CURRENT BUILDING CODES. 

I HOPE THE OCCUPY MOVEMENT RECOGNIZES THE NECESSITY FOR LAWS GOVERNING A FREE SOCIETY.  THIS IS NOT A ‘FREE-FOR-ALL-SOCIETY.’  IN A FREE SOCIETY, YOU DON’T JUST GET TO ‘DO YOUR THING.’ 

THERE ARE BASIC RIGHTS, SPELLED OUT IN THE CONSTITUTION TO DEFINE OUR FREEDOM.  IT REQUIRES THAT DEFINITION BECAUSE, WITHOUT IT, WE WOULD BE A BARBARIC, FREE-FOR-ALL SOCIETY.  THE UNITED STATES IS NOT AN ANARCHY

UNFORTUNATELY, WE CAN’T TAKE IT FOR GRANTED THAT EVERYONE WILL  ACT WITH THE HIGHEST SET OF ETHICS.  IF THAT WAS HUMANLY POSSIBLE, THERE WOULD BE NO NEED FOR LAWS, AND WE WOULD HAVE FREEDOM IN THE MOST LITERAL SENSE OF THE WORD.

 I HAVE SUPPORTED THE OCCUPY MOVEMENT FOR MANY OF THEIR OBJECTIVES, AND THEIR CONTINUAL EFFORT TO SHOW THE SHALLOW POOL OF ETHICS OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES DROWN THEMSELVES AS THEY TAKE THE COUNTRY WITH THEM. 

THE OAKLAND GROUP WAS CLEARLY OUTSIDE OF THE LAW, AND PROVOKED A RESPONSE FROM THOSE SWORN TO UPHOLD THE LAW.  THEY NEED TO APOLOGIZE TO THE CITY, RE-GROUP, AND REORGANIZE FOR THE SAKE OF THEIR INITIAL OBJECTIVES.

I WOULD SUGGEST THE OCCUPY MOVEMENT RE-GROUP, AND RE-OCCUPY WITHIN THE CONFINES OF OUR LAWS, POSSIBLY BECOMING A PART OF THE LAW MAKING PROCESS FROM THE INSIDE, OUT.  MAKE IT COUNT FOR SOMETHING.  OCCUPY NO LONGER HAS TO LITERALLY OCCUPY.  THAT POINT HAS BEEN MADE. 

WHATEVER OCCUPY DOES AS A GROUP, I DON’T WANT THEM TO GO AWAY.  I WANT THEM TO TAKE THE NEXT STEP.  BECOME A POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE.  PUT UP CANDIDATES.  OCCUPY THAT WAY BECAUSE OCCUPY JUST MIGHT FIND THAT AS THE QUICKEST PATH TO ACHIEVING WHAT THEY SET OUT TO DO IN THE FIRST PLACE.

STAY ACTIVE AS A GROUP.  MEET OFTEN.  PLAN.  KEEP POINTING OUT THE BREAKS, AND MORE SO, THE FIXES.  BECOME A RESPECTED PART OF THE SOCIETY YOU WISH TO TAKE AN ACTIVE ROLE.  DON’T STAND ON THE OUTSKIRTS.

 
2 Comments

Posted by on January 29, 2012 in Bill of Rights, Occupy Wall Street

 

Tags: , , ,

WHAT GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO…….

Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness?  Your American citizenship via the U.S. Constitution.

Life is open to interpretation but, in this case, it is your interpretation of life.  Your life.  Not, life as you see fit for all.  Each individual has a right to their life.

Liberty.  Freedom to follow the life you envision for yourself without interference from your neighbor or, your government.

Pursuit of Happiness.  Happiness belongs to the individual, and you have a right to be happy. The pursuit is the right, and the result is up to the individual.  It clearly identifies the government to be a non-impeding factor of your pursuit.

Each of these tenets were meant for each individual American citizen.

We have allowed public opinion to dictate through our government what the boundaries will be for all.  We have become the judge, and the jury.  The dictators.  You have those basic rights as long as you fall within the boundaries.

Those scoffing may ask, do we then have a free for all?  The answer is no.  You cannot blatantly deprive someone of their individual rights but, there has to be some rules governing societal behavior.  Therein, to the extreme may lie a conflict.

Liberty is complete freedom but, if you have 100% freedom, each individual with criminal intent must be allowed their freedom.  If that’s true, and we disallow their success, have we infringed on their rights?  Truly, this is an extreme to illustrate a point.

In the end, there must be some boundary on societal behavior, and those outside the boundary will be infringed upon.  In the original Virginia draft, a seldom mentioned right to safety exists.

So, Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness are somewhat limited, and possibly conflicting.  They have to be, and careful reading of the entire Constitution describes a necessary prescription for the possible conflicts on the surface.

Each time CONgress presents new legislation it, is usually a limitation.  One more infringement on individuals, and their rights.  CONgress has taken a right of infringement on each of us every time they enact a new law.  They have taken their rights, and responsibility too seriously as they recklessly micro-manage this country in every aspect which was not the intent of the Founding Fathers.

It was the intent that, we do not suppress religion nor, does the government take a position of promoting religion except, that we do have the right to believe as we wish.

It was never the intent that government step in to the morality of issues like, abortion. Only that they are, safe, and sanitary as all health care.  Otherwise, it would be between an individual, and a health care professional.  There are aspects that we do not understand of the individuals involved, and have no right to become the Google of their very private issues. 

In religious context, I understand there is only ONE judge, and if that’s so, who are you to pronounce judgement?  Pronouncing judgement of your own accord puts you in a group of the non-believing, distrustful, and unfaithful.

Today, government has run way over their boundaries giving us case law to govern every step, and every breath taken by, each individual.  The last few decades have been an exercise in unnecessary control.  A part of business law illustrates the point.

How does America get back to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness?

CONgress must have members who subscribe to those rights, and not the rights of who can contribute most to their electoral campaigns.  A group of real Americans who will pursue a de-legislating session to cut all unnecessary laws impeding those rights.  A group who understands the only road to these rights is a minimum of legislation as necessary for society to act in a respectful manner toward one, another.

Occupy Wall Street?

 
1 Comment

Posted by on January 13, 2012 in Bill of Rights, CONgress, U. S. Constitution

 

Tags: , , , , ,

DIMINISHING DEMOCRACY

Do we live in a diminishing democracy?  Have the mandates, and principles within the BillOf Rights, the entire Constitution, begun to fall?

English: Detail of Preamble to Constitution of...

Is it now okay for states, cities, and towns to circumvent America’s Constitutional principles with their own diverse laws?  If it is, then it is a license to put the Constitution in the shredder.

Whether you agree with Occupy Wall Street or, not is irrelevant under our rights under the Constitution.  They have the right to assemble in protest.

If you believe they do not have the right then, neither do we have that right.  And if we don’t, what’s next?  What articles of freedom are next to fall?

Only 45 – 50 years ago, we were to fear the Soviets of Russia, and a dictatorship.  Why?  No freedom, and we were the beacon of light to worldwide freedom.  In Soviet Russia, the populous had no rights prescribed under a Constitution of Freedom as we have in the United States.

Are there no more refills on the prescription?

Enhanced by Zemanta
 

Tags: , , , , ,

I AM ONLY FOLLOWING ORDERS

In Nazi Germany, they picked several classifications of people by, religion, and disabilities amongst others. They erased them from their society.  They would have a pure, super-race that would defend the government regardless of policy.  Those able to choose life over death would just ‘follow orders,’ even if it meant sacrificing any ethical standards employed as the very fabric of their existence,

The United States is in the process of picking out people, and they are being profiled in some cases with a permanent record as a dissident but, in actuality peaceably assembling according to the rights afforded in the Constitution of the United States.  They are brave people testing the written word of this country set by, the Founding Fathers.

The United States is at war with itself.  The U.S.A. is at war with the very principles of the Constitution that supposedly bind them.  Local jurisdictions are breaking up peaceful assemblies of protest all across the country.  The authorities are arresting people for peaceably assembling on the streets to file their grievances about the government, and its’ refusal to perform as it should.

They begin peacefully but,  local enforcers arrive with all kinds of weapons to disperse the crowds. Then, it begins to appear as something it isn’t.  They stir up the crowd, tell them it is no longer peaceful, and begin arresting people.  What motivates local authorities?  One four letter word; Fear.

So, I ask:  How is it, we send our children to school to learn these very principles while in practice these same principles are literally being violated?  Are we telling outright lies to our children?  ‘Looks good on paper, just don’t actually exercise your rights within the Constitution because there are consequences in real life.’  Do we teach them an allegiance based on false principle?

When I was in grade school, we were taught that we stood alone as a pillar of freedom for the entire planet.  As I look back, I wonder what they taught, and what they are teaching the kids in England, Australia, and Canada to name only three of several other ‘free’ societies.

We have had a certain ‘elitism’ about our freedom, and people of other countries at our doorstep with a desire for the same freedoms spelled out in our Constitution.  Are they now seeing us differently as videos of our reality are digitally displayed for the planet?  Are they laughing at us?

My son who is, a college student understands the principles but, also has a lot of common sense. He realizes you must always be aware.  The best of intentions may only, in reality be, just intentions not to be practiced without consequence.

Those in law enforcement choosing their paychecks over unemployment are just following orders.  Many of them have families.  They are just following orders.  Sound familiar?

Those who uphold the status-quo miss the point, altogether.  Right now, they are naming a chosen group as dissidents but, what if, tomorrow the status-quo become the hunted.  The hunter may be somebody who is ‘just following orders.’

Core principles have been shattered in the United States.  Too many interpretations of those principles.  No interpretations necessary as those principles were well written, succinct, absolutely without question to the point.  Read the Constitution verbatim.

The Founding Fathers of this country would be so proud of the ‘Occupiers’ for exercising their rights under the Constitution to peaceably assemble in protest , and conversely so ashamed of our CONgress’ inability to act  on anybody’s behalf, save 1%.

..Of the people, for the people by, the people……Let me interpret…..Of 1% of the people, for 1% of the people, by, 1% of the people….

 

Tags: , , , , ,

UNINFORMED, ILL INFORMED, NOT INFORMED

I want to be sure no credence is paid to the uninformed, ill informed, the not informed. 

So, with every sentence to anyone who will listen, I will make sure that you are included as being uninformed in every spoken situation I encounter.  Every discussion, every written word will be about you, and how uninformed you really are.  It will be habitual, and neatly packaged.  You will be discredited.  You’ll be labeled.  There will be many laughs at your expense.

I will be so good at this, that others will stop asking questions because I will be believed.  It will be everywhere just because I have repeated the message over, and over that you, are uninformed.  I know you, are uninformed, and misinformed.  You must be, because I am informed, and part of the status-quo.  I like the status-quo because I have power, and money. 

How do I know you’re uninformed?  Obviously, you disagree with me.  Rather than get in to any issue at hand, I will, with more fervor than you could ever imagine, let everyone know just how uninformed you are.  That’s how I will deal with my fear of you.  I will scream the loudest! 

I have more access to the media than you because of my status in society.  Let me pause to laugh momentarily as I truly realize you, among others like you, have given me this status.  You dare to question or, protest the status-quo where I am one of the beneficiaries.  I will crush, you, and any positive reputation you may enjoy.  You will be known as an uninformed misfit.

The COWards of CONgress are fearful because, at one time they were thinking these ‘Occupiers’  at Wall Street would just fade.  They’d go away.  Instead, the group has taken the opposite direction, and expanded over the entire planet.

This is the kind of garbage Occupy Wall Street participants must endure on a daily basis from the COWards of CONgress, and others who, by the way are uninformed, ill informed, not informed about Americans who must make deals with utilities each month to keep their status-quo of electricity, gas, and water for their homes.  The Americans who have mounting health, and education bills that so consume them as they frantically look for a way to help themselves out of their financial problems.  Those who must just, walk away from their mortgages. The Americans who join the many as no longer credit worthy by, the status-quo.

The status-quo enables many career politicians to continue their eventual capture, and destruction of the Bill Of Rights.  

It is best for the status-quo that as many avenues as possible are blocked.  Nobody gets through.  Violate the basic freedoms afforded Americans to peaceably assemble, and the right to protest  as an adversary of the status-quo.  Anything.  Because after all, it is the status-quo, and because it is the status-quo, that’s the American way.  Don’t be un-American, and uninformed.

My status-quo begins here: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.   

 

 

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 59 other followers